Wednesday, 2 January 2013

Nigeria seeks Swiss help in $6.8-billion fuel subsidy probe

The Citizen
Nigeria seeks Swiss help in $6.8-billion fuel subsidy probe
Nigeria has sought Switzerland’s help in the country’s investigation of a multi-billion dollar fuel subsidy scam, after some Swiss oil trading houses refused to cooperate with the authorities in Abuja, Nigerian officials said. Nigeria opened an investigation in January into fraud in the administration of the subsidy scheme after an abortive attempt to remove it by President Goodluck Jonathan.
Ibrahim Lamorde, chairman of Nigeria’s Economic and Financial Crimes Commission which is investigating the fraud, said a request was sent to Swiss authorities in October after some trading houses declined to provide documents. “They are not forthcoming. And most of the information is not in their Nigerian offices,” Lamorde told Reuters on Friday.
He declined to name the companies which did not cooperate. Lamorde’s commission is trying to unpick a web of collusion between fuel importers and corrupt officials that has led to the state paying for nearly double the amount of fuel it receives. Asked if trading houses were themselves complicit in the fraud, he said: “We just want information to confirm some of the things the (Nigerian fuel) marketers have said … whether they sold such products to the Nigerians or not.”
A parliamentary probe put the cost of the fraud to the Nigerian state at $6.8 billion between 2009 and 2011, almost a quarter of the national budget. As a result of the probe some Nigerian fuel importers have been charged in courts but no one has yet been convicted, and most of the targets have been relatively low level, rather than big players. Some are on the run.
The judicial authority for Geneva, home to many private trading houses, said Switzerland had requested additional information on the probe from Nigerian authorities. “This case involves suspected subsidy fraud on imports of refined products by Nigerian companies. They acquired the oil from companies based in Geneva,” a spokeswoman for the authority said in an emailed statement to Reuters. She added that Geneva-based trading houses were not directly implicated in the Nigerian investigation. She did not name the companies involved in shipments. Past suppliers have included many large Swiss-based private trading houses.
Swiss-based Nimex Petroleum was suspended earlier this year by Nigeria’s fuel regulator for failing to provide documents for shipments. Nigeria is Africa’s top oil exporter but it imports most of the fuel it consumes because its refineries are ill-maintained and run at a fraction of their capacity. The government buys the fuel then sells it to the public at cheap, subsidised prices.
Private Nigeria-based fuel marketers are thought to have abused the country’s subsidy system by misreporting fuel volumes, for example by reporting the same cargo more than once in a practice known as “round-tripping.” Some of this fuel was sourced from tankers chartered by large trading houses anchored offshore Nigeria. A source at a trading house said some international commodity trading firms had been asked earlier this year to provide paperwork of fuel shipments to Nigerian authorities as part of the probe.

Fuel Subsidy Scam: MD of Nadabo Energy charged to court

Culled from the Citizen
Fuel Subsidy Scam: MD of Nadabo Energy charged to court
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has arraigned another suspect in the fuel subsidy scandal.
The commission on Monday charged Abubakar Ali Peters and Nadabo Energy Limited before the Lagos High Court sitting in Igbosere on Lagos Island for fraudulently obtaining over N1.4 billion from the Federal Government under the petroleum Support Fund.
Abubakar and his company were  said to have obtained N1.464 billion from government by falsely claiming that the sum represented subsidy accruing to them.
They  were charged on a two count fraud and forgery before Justice Christopher Balogun.
“The offence is contrary to section 1 (2) and (3) of the Advanced Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006,” EFCC said in the charge.
When the charges were read to  Peters, he pleaded not guilty. The Prosecution counsel, Ben Ubi, asked the court to give a trial date as the EFCC was ready to proceed with the case.
Counsel to the defendant, Taiwo Taiwo however told the court that his client had filed a bail application.
Justice Balogun has ordered that the defendant be remanded in EFCC custody till December 11, 2012, when the bail application will be heard. He adjourned the substantive case to January 16, 2013 for trial.

FG reinstates 3645 revoked land titles in FCT

Culled from the Citizen
FG reinstates 3645 revoked land titles in FCT
Federal Government has approved the immediate reinstatement of 3,645 plots hitherto revoked in the Federal Capital Territory.
The FCT Minister, Senator Bala Mohammed, in a statement in Abuja on Monday said that President Goodluck Jonathan approved the reinstatement of the titles.
The titles were part of land allocated between May 17 and 28, 2007 in FCT but alleged to have been irregularly allocated within the time frame and therefore recommended by the Senate to be revoked.
Mohammed explained that the revocation of the plots arose from a resolution reached by the Senate in 2007 based on the report by the Senate Committee on FCT that investigated the activities of an erstwhile FCT minister.
The minister recalled that the Senate had then recommended the withdrawal of 3,645 plots from title -holders on  the ground that they were allocated from May 17 to 29, 2007.
The reason given by the legislators for passing the revocation resolution was that the Federal Executive Council was already dissolved at the time the plots were allocated.
Mohammed said, “It was later discovered and confirmed by the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation that the FEC was not dissolved until May 29, 2007 when power was transmitted to the succeeding federal administration.
“In view of that discovery and the fact that the implementation of the Senate resolution by the succeeding FCT Administration had inflicted pains on owners of such titles and in many cases resulted in litigation, the matter was revisited by the 6th Senate which subsequently withdrew its earlier resolution.”
He emphasised that based on the Senate resolution, the FCT Administration recommended to the President to approve  that all titles revoked as a result of the then Senate resolutions on revoked titles in 2007 be reinstated.

Transparency Int’l ranks Nigeria 35th most corrupt country … as FG faults report

Culled from the Citizen
Transparency Int’l ranks Nigeria 35th most corrupt country … as FG faults report
Nigeria still ranks high in global corruption perception.  Only 34 countries separate her from prime number one position in a survey which featured 176 countries.
The report is coming when the Federal Government claims it winning the fight against corruption. Nigeria has been ranked the 35th most corrupt country in the world.
In the 2012 report by Transparency International on global corruption released on Wednesday, Nigeria scored 27 out of a maximum 100 marks to clinch the 139th position out of the 176 countries surveyed for the report. It shared that position with Azerbaijan, Kenya, Nepal and Pakistan while Countries such as Togo, Mali, Niger and Benin fared better than Nigeria.
But the Federal Government in a swift reaction to the report faulted the methodology adopted by TI that still pictured Nigeria among the top corrupt countries.
Minister of Information, Mr Labaran Maku stated at the end of the weekly Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting presided over by President Goodluck Jonathan, he said both the TI report and a recent Gallup Poll that also showed that Nigeria was among corrupt nations globally were products of interactions with Nigerians and synopsis of negative media reports.
Last year’s report placed Nigeria 143rd, making it the 37th most corrupt country. However, when compared with this year’s result, it is difficult to say whether Nigeria has recorded any significant improvement.
According to the report, this year’s index ranks 176 countries/territories by their perceived levels of public sector corruption. The index draws on 13 surveys covering expert assessments and surveys of business people.
The Corruption Perceptions Index is the leading indicator of public sector corruption, offering a yearly snapshot of the relative degree of the corruption problem by ranking countries from all over the globe.
The organization has urged governments to integrate anti-corruption actions into all aspects of decision-making and prioritize better rules on political financing, make public spending and contracting more transparent, and make public bodies more accountable.
According to Maku,  all these are perceptions of both the people and the media practitioners which fail to appreciate that the incumbent administration was taking steps to deal with corruption by employing systematic and institutional approaches that are gradual in yielding results.
Maku gave the instance of the prosecution of fraudsters implicated in the fuel subsidy scam, investigation into the pension fund scandal, the geometric auditing of Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) and curbing of graft in the supply of fertiliser and seeds to farmers, as commendable efforts by Government in tackling corruption.
He recalled that when President Jonathan promised to curtail patronage in the oil and gas sector, thereby introducing deregulation of the sector, Nigerians became hysterical and shut down the proposal by ‘mobilising to oppose it.’
“Government has continued to take decisive measures against defaulters in the fuel subsidy scam. There are so many issues involved in dealing with corruption. When you are systematic and deliberate reform goes deeper,” Maku said.
“The president does not seat in court to imprison people. There are institutions set up to do that,” the Minister observed, advising journalists to follow up on institutional  proceedings to get to the roots of matters and thereby unearth omissions and commissions, so that government will be able to track and act on such.
He agreed that Nigeria has been bogged down by corruption for many years but appealed that this trend cannot just be eradicated with the wave of a magic wand. “If there are areas where things are not be done right, journalists should follow up,” he advised.
“The federal government will continue to support all efforts to fight abuses,” he posited, adding that it will, however not squander the resources, material and human, available to it in doing so.

Britain jails shipper of 80,000 guns to Nigeria

Culled the Citizen
Britain jails shipper of 80,000 guns to Nigeria
An arms dealer who helped to ship thousands of guns and ammunition from China to Nigeria without a licence has been jailed.
Gary Hyde, 43, was found guilty of breaching UK trade controls at London’s Southwark Crown Court in October. Jurors heard the delivery in 2007 included 40,000 AK-47 assault rifles, 30,000 rifles, 10,000 pistols and 32 million rounds of ammunition.
Hyde, of Newton on Derwent, East Yorkshire, was jailed for seven yearsHyde, who started in the gun trade when he was 14, flouted British legislation designed to control the trade and transportation of the weapons despite being regarded as an “authority” on those laws.
The businessman, based in York, acted in “a deliberate and calculated breach of the law” to pull off the $1.3m (£808,000) deal in return for around £280,000, which he attempted to hide in a bank account in Liechtenstein.
The account was registered in the name of a trust of which Hyde and his children were named as the sole beneficiaries.
It is thought the weapons were being bought on behalf of the Nigerian Police Force.
The Nation could not reach the police authorities last night. Spokesman Frank Mba’s telephone was ringing but not replied.
After a ten-day trial in October, a jury unanimously convicted Hyde of two counts of breaching UK laws and one count of concealing criminal property.
Hyde, who has no previous convictions, was initially tried on the same charges in January of this year.
But several days into the first trial, Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith discharged the jury and said: ‘I’ve come to the conclusion this fails in law on the particular facts of case.
“It is to do with the framing of the Trade in Goods (Control) Order 2003, the bedrock of this particular case.”
He later explained he had identified errors between guidance documents to the legislation and the legislation itself that meant it was not possible to continue.
He said: “In my view, the jury, properly directed, could not be satisfied that the defendant intended to evade that particular prohibition and accordingly I’ve concluded that this prosecution must fail.”
But prosecutors took the case to the Court of Appeal and the judge’s decision to terminate the trial was overruled. Southwark Crown Court then began the second trial and sentenced Hyde to seven years yesterday.
Prosecutor Mukul Chawla QC said: “This case is about the shipment of huge quantity of guns and ammunition from China to Nigeria in 2007.
“That shipment, because it was being partly arranged and organised from the UK by Gary Hyde, required the permission of the Department for Business, Innovation, and Skills in the form of a licence.
“Mr Hyde, despite knowing that such a licence was required, helped to organise that shipment without seeking and obtaining the required licence.
“This was not an oversight but, say the prosecution, a deliberate and calculated breach of the law.
“In order to ensure that his illegal activities were not drawn to the attention of the UK authorities he placed, and thus concealed, the profits from this illegal trade in to a bank account in Liechtenstein.”
Mr Chawla said Hyde flouted UK legislation despite being “very familiar” with it.
“You will see evidence that he is in fact seen to be something of an authority on the matter,” he said.
Hyde, who was director of York Guns Ltd and Jago Ltd, based in Britain, brokered the deal alongside German businessman Karl Kleber, the owner of Transarms Handelgesellschaft, based in Worms, in Germany.
They dealt with two Irish men, Brendan Cahill and Neil Murray, who represented the Polish companies Deftech Ltd and Pinimi Ltd, which were acting for the Nigerian purchaser.
The guns had originally been expected to come from Chinese firm China Jing An Import and Export Corp, but the deal fell through and Hyde and Kleber turned to another Chinese firm, Poly Technologies Inc.
Commission agreements were signed for Hyde on behalf of a company called EWH Consultancy Ltd, which had been incorporated by Hyde in the British Virgin Islands in 2004. The sole shareholder of EWH was Hyde’s WHEK Trust.
Hyde smuggled 40,000 AK47 assault rifles, 30,000 other rifles, 10,000 9mm pistols and 32m rounds of ammunition.
He claimed he had not been in the UK at critical times when the deal was being negotiated and therefore had not flouted UK legislation.
In a prepared statement, given after his arrest in 2009, Hyde said: “I do not believe that I engaged in any activity in the UK which I understand required a licence but where instead I decided to ignore that obligation.”
Stephen Solley QC, defending, had argued he was a “legitimate businessman” and said the allegation he knowingly broke UK law was “ludicrous”.
He said: “The idea you could be sure this man put two fingers up to the criminal law knowingly is completely ridiculous.”
Jailing Hyde, Judge Loraine-Smith said: “You are a man of good character who started work at York Guns when you were only 14, and by 2003 you had built that into an international wholesaler with 20 staff.
“There were numerous lawful and properly completed deals, many involving this country’s armed forces, but then you became carried away with the enormous profits you could see could be made.
“I accept that you opened the account in Liechtenstein to reduce your tax liabilities in lawful ways but it was conveniently there for you to launder the money from this unlawful deal.
“Applying for a license would have been very easy, but I very much suspect that you thought that applying for a licence would have risked the UK authorities finding out about your substantial earnings.”
He added: “You have shown a lot of remorse for the position you find yourself in but it was not reflected by a guilty plea.”
Hyde, of Mask Lane, Newton on Derwent, Yorkshire, denied two counts of becoming knowingly concerned in the movement of controlled goods between March 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007, and one count of concealing criminal property between March 1, 2006, and December 16, 2008.

Fuel subsidy: N232b collected illegally, says Okonjo Iweala

Culled from the Citizen 
Fuel subsidy: N232b collected illegally, says Okonjo Iweala
Finance Minister and coordinating minister of Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala said on Monday that 50 oil marketers fraudulently collected N232 billion from the Federal Government as fuel subsidy.
The government, she said, had recovered only N29 billion through debt swap.
According to her, a forensic investigation carried out by the government revealed the whooping subsidy fraud.
The Minister, who spoke at the 18th Nigerian Economic Summit meeting in Abuja, said the government engaged 20 forensic experts, examiners and auditors from PriceWaterHouse Coopers and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and they have worked for more than four months on the subsidy claims.
“Last week, the work was submitted to Mr. President and of the amount verified, they have determined N232 billion. You know they came out with N270 billion initially; now they are out with N232 billion claims of oil subsidy that are not substantiated or fraudulent.”
She said on the strength of the forensic investigation, the government had started to recover the claims from the affected marketers.
She vowed that the government would recover the cash fraudulently obtained through subsidy claims.
Okonjo-Iweala regretted that the forensic investigation and the government’s resolve to hold indicted marketers to account had slowed down the oil importation programme.
She, however, stressed that government had continued to pay genuine subsidy claims to petroleum marketers.
“We are going through forensic investigation because it is the kind of work that requires indepth investigation and that is because we want to do a thorough job on the matter because Nigerians want government to take corruption out of the way so that we can be like other nations of the world where things are done properly,” Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala said.
The presidential task force headed by Access Bank Managing Director Aigboje Aig-Imoukuede and the National Assembly probe have verified slightly more than N3 trillion , but government decided to subject the reports to forensic examinations.
At a news conference, also in Abuja yesterday, Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala said the government had released N170 billion as cash backing for the fourth quarter of Budget 2012.
“On the issue of cash backing for the fourth quarter; as you know, we released N300 billion last quarter for a total of N1.01 trillion in releases and it was said that we have not cash-backed the fourth quarter
“This is not correct; we have cash-backed N170bn of the fourth quarter release. About N111billion of that has gone straight into the accounts of Ministries, Department and Agencies as cash.”

Court throws out IBB $12.4bn Gulf Oil Windfall case

Culled from the Citizen 
Court throws out IBB $12.4bn Gulf Oil Windfall case
A Federal High Court presided over by Justice Gabriel kolawole  on Thursday in Abuja dismissed an application demanding information on the statement of account relating to the spending of the 12.4 billion dollars oil windfall between 1988 to 1994.
Kolawole held that the court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the matter.
The judge  further held that the applicants did not have the requisite “locus standi’’ to institute the action.
The Registered Trustees of Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), Access to Justice and Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA) filed the application.
The Women Advocates Research and Documentation Centre (WARDC), Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) and Partnership for Justice were de-listed as joint applicants due to wrong representation.
The Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) were the respondents.
According to Kolawole, the applicants could not establish the allegation of a “dedicated account’’ within the CBN where the money was domiciled.
He said the action was “status barred’’ as applicants failed to approach the court within 12 months allowed by law in 2005 after the release of the late Chief Pius Okigbo Report on the misappropriation of the windfall.
He said that the applicant had failed to produce a certified copy of the Okigbo Report, adding that “the issues raised remained doubtful in the circumstance’’.
The  Judge also held the applicants did not provide enough basis in law to push the court to grant the reliefs they were seeking, adding that “the claims are non-justiceable’’.
The judge said, “More worrisome is the fact the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules 2009 relied on by the applicant is in conflict with Section 46 (1) (3) of the 1999 Constitution.
“The Chief Justice of Nigeria has assumed legislative powers in the amendment of the rules to enlarge the justiceable rights of the applicants not originally captured in the Constitution.
“This is, however, not done to discredit the justiceable rights as enshrined in the African Charter on Fundamental Human Rights, which the applicants may have relied on heavily.
“All the equitable relives sought in the application are hereby dismissed, unless the applicants are able to establish the existence of a dedicate account which the money was kept, I am afraid the other auxiliary relives shall not be granted.
The applicants had in 2010 sought to unravel the protracted case of the $12.4 billion Gulf War oil windfall which is widely believed to have been misappropriated. They brought the motion on notice pursuant to Order 1 Rule 2 of the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 as reserved by Section 315 of the 1999 Constitution.
They have also relied on Order 2 Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 and the inherent jurisdiction of the court.
The applicants, therefore, sought an order compelling the respondents to publish detailed statement of the account relating to the spending of the $12.4 billion oil windfall between 1988 and 1994.
The applicant also sought for an order directing the respondents to diligently and effectively bring to justice anyone suspected of corruption and mismanagement of the money.
They further sought for an order directing the respondents to return to the Federal account any money which was the subject matter of corruption.
The applicant sought for an order directing the respondents to provide adequate reparation, which may take the form of restitution, compensation, satisfaction or guarantee of non-repetition to millions of Nigerians that had been denied as the result of the misuse of the money.
The applicant had among other declarations, prayed the court to rule that the refusal of the respondents to release the detailed statement of account relating to the windfall was illegal and unlawful.
The applicant argued that they were entitled to information as guaranteed by Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.
Mr Sola Egbeyinka, who held the brief of Mr Femi Falana, counsel to the applicants told newsmen after the proceedings that the ruling would be challenged.